艺术人生

真在偷听！一聊啥手机App就推啥，上海市政协常委：处罚太轻！主管部门回应_我的网站

A |     

    Illustration: Tang Tengfei/GT
Some Indian media outlets and regional political forces have recently sought to amplify allegations of an unverified China-India border confrontation, while official signals from Beijing and New Delhi have emphasized stability, communication and the importance of managing differences through established mechanisms.
The contrasting narratives have emerged at a moment when exchanges between China and India in various fields have gradually resumed, and cooperation has been advanced in an orderly manner, Chinese experts noted, warning that sensationalizing border-related claims could disrupt the hard-won momentum in bilateral ties and the two countries should prevent the boundary question from hijacking their broader relationship.
Contrasting narratives 
The latest media speculation was partly triggered by claims made by the People's Party of the so-called "Arunachal Pradesh" (PPA), a regional Indian political party. According to The Arunachal Times, a local Indian newspaper, a four-member PPA "fact-finding committee" led by former minister and party adviser Kahfa Bengia visited the so-called "Taksing area" (known as Taxin, in Zangnan, Southwest China's Xizang Autonomous Region) on July 10 and subsequently alleged that Indian forces had been prevented from accessing several patrolling points.
The claims were then amplified by Indian news outlet ThePrint, which reported on Tuesday, citing unnamed sources, that Chinese and Indian patrols had allegedly come "face to face" near Taxin in late July.
The outlet further claimed that Chinese personnel subsequently left before returning in early August and setting up "two or three tents."
However, ThePrint acknowledged that sources in India's defense and security establishment said the "situation was well under control."
Some other Indian reports have also questioned the sensational allegations. India Today reported on Wednesday that Indian government sources dismissed social media claims circulating about what was described as "slow encroachment," while noting that similar allegations regarding the area had previously been rejected by local authorities and the Indian Army.
In fact, the claims stand in contrast to the official diplomatic signals coming from both sides.
Asked on Tuesday about reports concerning the border, Indian Ministry of External Affairs spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal said New Delhi takes border matters seriously and reiterated India's position that "the state of the border affairs will reflect on the state of our larger bilateral ties," according to a media briefing released by the ministry on its website on Tuesday.  
He also referred to existing mechanisms for dealing with border issues and preventing misunderstanding and miscalculation, according to the briefing. 
Responding on Wednesday to questions from Bloomberg and Reuters concerning social media claims about stepped-up Chinese military activity and a possible new border incident, Chinese Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Guo Jiakun said, "The China-India border situation is generally stable at the moment." 
"China and India held the 36th meeting of the Working Mechanism for Consultation and Coordination (WMCC) on China-India Border Affairs last week. The two sides agreed to maintain communication via diplomatic and military channels and jointly uphold peace and tranquility in the border areas," Guo said. 
Qian Feng, director of the Research Department at Tsinghua University's National Strategy Institute, told the Global Times on Thursday that the fact that the two sides continue to communicate through established channels shows that the border situation has not developed in the direction of escalation portrayed by some Indian media.
Such hype also came amid another development concerning Zangnan. India on August 7 announced what it called "standard" names for 27 locations in so-called "Arunachal Pradesh," a move that some Indian media outlets portrayed as an effort to counter China and further connected with the latest reports of border tensions.
China has firmly rejected the move. Responding to the issue on Monday, spokesperson Guo said, "Zangnan region is China's territory. China does not recognize the so-called 'Arunachal Pradesh' illegally set up by India." 
Guo said India's attempt to replace names long used by China with its so-called "standard names" is "illegal, null and void," and stressed that it would not change the fact that Zangnan belongs to China. 
Hu Zhiyong, a professor from Zhejiang International Studies University and a research fellow at the Institute of International Relations at the Shanghai Academy of Social Sciences, told the Global Times on Thursday that border and security issues have traditionally been susceptible to political manipulation in India's domestic politics. "When domestic economic and social problems become difficult to address, issues involving the borders with China or Pakistan can easily be pushed to the forefront to divert public attention," Hu explained.
He said economic pressures, concerns over foreign investment and the domestic business environment, together with accumulated public sentiment, could provide incentives for some political forces to magnify external disputes.
Hu argued that another problem lies in the tendency of some Indian political figures to bind the boundary question too closely to the entire China-India relationship. "The boundary issue is one part of bilateral relations, which also encompass political, economic, diplomatic, security and people-to-people exchanges," Hu said. "It should not be allowed to hijack the entire relationship."
Dialogue matters 
According to the Chinese Foreign Ministry's statement of the August 6 meeting, the two sides conducted constructive dialogue in a candid and friendly manner, had an in-depth exchange of views on further implementing the consensus reached during the 24th Round of Talks between the Special Representatives of China and India on the Boundary Question, and agreed to jointly prepare for the coming 25th Round of SR talks. The two sides also discussed boundary delimitation, border management, mechanism development, cross-border exchange and cooperation. The two sides agreed to continue to maintain diplomatic and military communication, and jointly safeguard peace and tranquility in the border areas.
Hu pointed out that the timing of the latest speculation is noteworthy, as border issues have at times been used by some forces in India in an attempt to gain leverage ahead of important bilateral interactions. 
The 36th WMCC meeting demonstrates that the two sides possess functioning channels through which disagreements can be addressed. This is particularly important as China and India seek to sustain the improvement in relations and prepare for further high-level interactions, said Chinese observers.
"The boundary dispute is a complicated issue left over from history and cannot be resolved overnight," Qian said. "What matters is to keep diplomatic and military communication channels open, promptly handle frontline frictions through established mechanisms, expand people-to-people exchanges and strengthen coordination under multilateral frameworks such as BRICS and the SCO."
。    “聊什么手机App就推什么”“刚说过想买什么东西下一秒就收到推送”不少网友吐槽遇到过这样的情况“手机‘窥探’、隔屏有耳，治理手机App，有没有什么能做在前面？”昨天（1月14日），上海市政协常委游闽键走进委员现场咨询活动，来到了市通讯管理局的“摊头”处。

B | 我想咨询个问题，手机窃听，“隔屏有耳”，App的备案是通信管理局在负责的，有没有什么监管机制？有没有一些能够做在前面的动作？其实我们有常态化检测，去年一年检测了10000多款上海地区备案的App。

C | 从结果来看，这个现象还是很多的，虽然我知道通信管理局、网信、公安都在管，为什么管了这么多、还有这么多？据相关调查显示，超过80%的智能手机用户担心自己的隐私被手机应用偷听或窥探，近三分之一的人表示反感App的精准推送广告行为，但苦于缺乏有效的防范手段和维权途径，只能在担忧中使用手机。针对个人信息保护，我国已出台《个人信息保护法》《App违法违规收集使用个人信息行为认定方法》《常见类型移动互联网应用程序必要个人信息范围规定》《互联网信息服务算法推荐管理规定》等法律法规。监管职责方面，网信办负责统筹，公安打击违法犯罪，通信管理局则聚焦行业治理。App的问题很复杂，不仅局限于上海，全国各地都有上架，还有在国外各种应用市场上架的。如果有的地方他不管，最后就没办法监管了，这就是个盲区嘛。

D | 从我们上海角度来讲，我们抓得还是很紧的。公安打击违法犯罪，我们通信管理局更关注行业治理。事后处罚是一方面，但是事后处罚真的是举证很困难，你感觉到被窃听、被“杀熟”，但很难把证据固化下来，不可能一次次去公证。我们管理机构有没有可能跨前一步，做一个第三方的评估或者审计？美国有个第三方评估的机制，评估你这个App的算法到底有没有侵犯公民的信息安全，我们有没有可能提前介入？还有，能不能加大处罚的力度？因为目前的违法成本太低了，就是下架，实际上起不到惩戒的作用。

E | 今年两会，游闽键提交了一份《关于加强App抓取、窥探用户隐私治理的建议》。他提出，各监管部门应通力合作，加大事前、事中、事后全链条监管，即备案、抽查、委托第三方审计评估，加大对侵犯用户隐私App的曝光、处罚力度。“这次咨询活动是一次友好的交流探讨，希望能为推动问题的解决贡献一份力量。”游闽键说。新民晚报（记者 陈佳琳），综合话匣子、网友评论编辑：龚紫珺编审：戴慧菁。

Current article:http://hthvaw7.tibiantasangnenti.buzz/list_bix/76s.html

Published on:19:28:41